November 5, 2008 | In: Society, Subsidiarity, Virtue, Worldviews
How Our Country Has Changed
Every presidential election has stirred this thought in me, but perhaps none more than the race that led to President Bill Clinton’s first term in office. I remember watching the debates and the “town hall meetings” hosted by MTV in which question after question started with the phrase, “As president, what would you do about . . .?” How times have changed.
As our country slowly solidified from individual and independent colonies into a united nation after the forging of the Constitution, the main political model in the United States was “Republican Virtue.” This beautifully idealistic philosophy had a number of tenets that you just don’t find in American politics today.
- The role of the government was to protect the common good, but to leave as much freedom as possible to the states (of course, this was in conflict between the federalists and the anti-federalists, but even the federalists believed in subsidiarity).
- The country as a whole struggled to balance liberty with order.
- Citizens were encouraged to freely sacrifice their own good for the good of the country – to put others first
- Virtue was seen as an indispensable requirement for the exercise of freedom
- Family was the core of citizenship – mothers had an esteemed role of educating children in the ways of virtue and citizenship
- Politicians were citizens who were elected to office primarily because of their proven character. They were people that the citizens trusted. Elected public officials, including United States senators, congressmen and presidents, served their term and then returned to their home and their normal occupation. There was not such thing as a professional politician
I do not mean to imply that America was perfect during this time of Republican Virtue. Negative campaigning, mud slinging, and corruption have always been part of politics (we are always fallen human beings). However, our country at least had an ideal to live up to. When did things change? Historians probably differ on this opinion, but I put the blame on the presidential campaign of President Andrew Jackson. Jackson’s campaign of “New Democracy” changed the public focus from Republican Virtue to competing self-interest. His message was the empowerment of the common man. Who could argue with that as a worthy goal? But “empowerment” meant that government exists to serve the individual citizen rather than that government exists due to the selfless service of citizens for the protection of the common good.
In my opinion, we are now bearing the fruits of the “New Democracy.” We have become a country of entitlement. We tend to see government as a great goodies box that exists to make my life easier. The principle of subsidiarity has been lost by both major political parties. Republican Virtue is viewed with suspicion and even contempt. The concepts of the common good and universal human rights have been replaced by universal private health care and the right to “privacy.” Idealism is scoffed and individualism is idealized.
We now have a Democrat government. Democrats have taken the House, Senate and the presidency. The Democrats tend to embrace the “New Democracy” much more wholeheartedly than Republicans. I think the next four years are going to show us the folly and the danger of such a public mindset. I am happy that we have finally elected an African-American president. However, I fear what free reign of “New Democracy” will do to our country.
We do still hang on to the shreds of what once made our country great. Let’s just hope that some day we can piece it back together and come to realize that responsibility for our neighbor’s welfare rests in our lap, not with the government.
[ad#seasonal]
Related Links:
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


2 Responses to How Our Country Has Changed
M.A.
November 5th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Hi,
I enjoy reading your blogs every now and then. I wanted to draw your attention to a word that you used in the second paragraph – “tenants”. I believe you mean “tenets”, which means a doctrine or principle held by a group.
Also, you mention “Republican Virtue” as something from the time of the early years of our country, but then later in your blog you refer to it as something that currently exists. Having witnessed the Republican party doing less than virtuous acts over the years (violating the Constitution, attacking another country in a pre-emptive strike, the list could go on and on), I have a hard time relating this concept of early America to the current Republican party. Not that the Democratic party has a corner on virtue – they certainly do not. I just question whether it is even relevant or realistic to consider “Republican Virtue” attainable in today’s society.
Another concept I’d like to discuss is idealism. Last night, watching Obama’s acceptance speech and seeing crowds of people from many different ethnic backgrounds joined together in celebration, I saw idealism and hope expressed in ways that they have not been expressed in many, many years, if ever at all. I saw people who previously felt disenfranchised, marginalized, and cast aside who were given hope and strength in this event and by this president-elect. To connect idealism with the Republican party is an oxymoron and a fallacy. To connect individualism with the Democratic party is equally false. Look at the script of the speech Obama gave – it was extremely idealistic and hopeful, calling us all to sacrifice for the common good.
From following your blog, I know you are a political conservative, and I feel your disappointment in the election. However, I do not join you in that disappointment. For the first time in a long time, I feel very hopeful about the future of our country.
Thanks for listening, and keep on writing. You do a good job.
Jeffrey S. Arrowood, MTS
November 5th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
@M.A. -
Ha! You caught an English teacher in his own game. Tenet is indeed the correct word. Thank you for your gentle correction.
Republican Virtue does not reside in the Republican party. I did not intend this post to be a commentary on the parties as they exist today, except for the part in which I specifically stated my fears about the Dems. Republican Virtue exists in the hearts of many Americans in both camps. Unfortunately it is not exercised by either political party in actual practice.
You have to be careful pegging me as a political conservative. I guess I do tend to lean that way, but I am registered as an independent. I am a moral conservative. I am not so much an economic conservative. I do not trust the economy to just work things out (which is, by the way, a “New Democracy” tenet – competing self interests will balance each other out). I disagree with the way the Republican party handles immigration and the death penalty. I find it difficult to fully support either political party, but the moral issues are the most important and because of them I am currently a supporter of the political conservatives who also happen to be politically and economically conservative.
Finally, there is a difference between idealism (as I am using the term) and hope. Idealism is the belief that there are certain ideals that we should live up to. Modernism (a philosophy embraced heavily by social liberals) has deconstructed the ideals by both saying that they are impossible to live and by claiming that they are subjectively determined (“that may be fine for you but it’s not necessarily what I believe”). Obama’s speech was full of optimism, and admittedly it hinted at some ideals (racial unity and equality could be considered an ideal), but it wasn’t much idealism as I use the term in this post (“Americans need to live up to these principles . . .”).
Thank you for your comment. I appreciate your ability to disagree with me in a civil and even loving way. I hope that your optimism about the next four years is realized, and that my fears are not.